The United States Navy, now powers the vessels they use to dominate the world with nuclear and steam power (produced from cooling the nuke cores).
I’d also add, the plant you are talking about was old tech, build 30 years after nuclear power/energy/tech was discovered or invested. Today, 80 years have past.
We could also say the ships are in the water/ocean which gives them a cooling advantage Vs a land/sea/water based nuclear plant.
UK - 7
Russia, yes unknown #
China 2 carriers known for sure. # unknown
Japan is buying
France is a big yes, unknown amount of “fleets” of nuclear powered vessels.
France and Great Britain don’t even produce oil, so unless they want to buy oil off of Russians, to wage war on Russia. Nuclear it is, or maybe solar and hope for a sunny day.
So the richest and most powerful people on Earth intend and practice the use of Nuclear energy to maintain their dominance.
Great for Thee, but not for Me.
Outside of a people falling asleep at the nuclear panel board, when has nuclear energy gone wrong. 3 times, 3 times reactors have got too hot. 3 mile, Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi.
Wind was never viable. The cost (energy) to mine the metals and then the energy used to create coils. The Wind Generators will never produce more than it cost to build. They are tax write-offs of governments and counties to use so they can get away with pollution. I’m literally telling the truth. Edison causes massive Earth quakes as they try to Cap Thermal Wells… So what do they do instead of being sued in a class action/joint law suit, settle to provide CA with a Solar and Wind field. Which has never produced what it cost to run annually and as of now has become a problem for CA as destroying it will also cost Millions. Thanks Edison, the bribe was nice instead of having to follow the laws we have to follow. But ultimately, Edison sells us electricity, so why would they give us a profitable generation plant??? to shoot themselves in the foot and decrease profits.
This is why I started by saying conspiracy. If a ‘conspiracy’ could exist to execute JFK , than controlling how hundred of Trillions of dollars will be profited , seems rather logical.
NASA hopes to have the Nuclear thermal propulsion in action by 2030, as they’ve publicly stated. The whole “gas tanks in space” got old and was not viable. Most astronauts dies in that explosion. So NASA opted for the safest plan they could.
When teenager, David Hahn ( David Hahn - Wikipedia ) built a reactor for the Boy Scouts in his garden shed. People and Authorities, freaked out, based on fear and ignorance. While he did expose the property to radiation. He proved to them the threat was not real, just in their heads. So the US Navy hired him. No charges were ever filled as he basically outsmarted the generalized propaganda about the dangers of Nuclear power. On the “huss huss” down low, the safe materials he used, were outlawed.
Obviously I feel pretty strong in this direction or belief. So I ask you. Why not? what logical reasons exist to not provide nuclear power.
And what do I really know?? as I talk about propaganda and misleading info, it is quite possible I’m full of shhh and have been lead astray myself.
Humans are chalked full of fears, most are propagated for profit. So do Cell phones give you cancer or not? So Pac-Bell started that propaganda. Long story around, they ended analog frequency and went digital , Pac-Bell started making cell phones. When was the last time you heard someone say Cell phones cause cancer? The same radio waves they used to claim caused cancer, were the same radio waves powering the TV’s that told of the dangers of Cell phone caused Cancer. So who might be misleading you about information about Nuclear power.
EGP-6 reactors are being used all over. China seems to really like them.
