The Contenders
Antminer KS5
The Antminer KS5 is a powerhouse with a mining capability of 21 TH/s, drawing 3150W of power. With a current yield of around $5000 USD per month, it’s a behemoth in the mining world. However, its eye-watering price of 30,000 Euros makes it a significant investment.
iBelink BM-KS Max
The iBelink BM-KS Max, with its 11 TH/s mining speed and 3300W power consumption, is priced at 12,000 Euros. It’s worth noting that the iBelink BM-KS Max faces short availability in the market, a challenge largely attributed to the ongoing global chip shortage.
IceRiver KS3M
Lastly, the IceRiver KS3M presents itself with a 6 TH/s mining speed and a power requirement of 3200W. Priced at 7,000 Euros, it’s the least powerful device in this lineup but still a contender in the mining arena.
The Analysis
Price per TH/s
To determine which machine offers the best value for mining power, we calculate the price per TH/s:
- Antminer KS5: 30,000 Euros / 21 TH/s = approximately 1428.57 Euros per TH/s
- iBelink BM-KS Max: 12,000 Euros / 11 TH/s = approximately 1090.91 Euros per TH/s
- IceRiver KS3M: 7,000 Euros / 6 TH/s = approximately 1166.67 Euros per TH/s
The iBelink BM-KS Max offers the most attractive price per TH/s, suggesting that it provides the most hashing power for your investment.
Power Efficiency per TH/s
Evaluating power efficiency, we calculate the power usage per TH/s for each device:
- Antminer KS5: 3150W / 21 TH/s = approximately 150W per TH/s
- iBelink BM-KS Max: 3300W / 11 TH/s = approximately 300W per TH/s
- IceRiver KS3M: 3200W / 6 TH/s = approximately 533.33W per TH/s
The Antminer KS5 shines in power efficiency, utilizing the least amount of power per TH/s, which can lead to significant savings in electricity costs over time.
Conclusion
The choice between these mining rigs depends on individual priorities and circumstances. The Antminer KS5, despite its high initial cost, stands out in power efficiency, potentially offering lower long-term operating costs. This makes it an appealing option for those who prioritize efficiency and have the capital for an upfront investment.
On the other hand, the iBelink BM-KS Max strikes a balance between cost and performance, offering the best price per TH/s. Its current market scarcity, however, could be a limiting factor for potential buyers.
The IceRiver KS3M, while the least powerful, might appeal to those with limited initial capital who still want to enter the mining space, keeping in mind its higher power consumption per TH/s.
In conclusion, each of these devices has its unique strengths and trade-offs. Prospective buyers should weigh these factors carefully, considering both the short-term financial outlay and the long-term operational costs, to make the most informed decision in their cryptocurrency mining endeavors.
